Is everyone obscenely greedy, or is everyone extremely lazy? Perhaps the population count is representative rather than exact, and that 70 refers to an abstract grouping rather than the full total - but why, then, would the same not apply to the number of food workers? There is some imbalance I can't understand - how could a ratio of almost one food worker to every two people fail to provide enough? (Yes, I have been careful to spread fields, cabins and barns out so no-one has to make long, hungry treks for sustenance).

20 fuel workers.Īnd yet they are starving to death.

Firewood is supplied by 16 foresters providing logs to 4 woodcutters (any more woodcutters and they'd have nothing to do, lest that sound low).

Food is supplied by 12 fishermen, 7 farmers, 12 hunters and 8 gatherers.

(There's no campaign as such, by the way: you start with a randomly-generated map, immediate access to all buildings, and keep going/growing for as long as you can.) Here's an example, from a relatively early stage of a game, although it still took a bloody long time to get there. If I became frustrated, all I had to do was picture these weather-worn medieval folk shovelling endless amounts of fish, venison, potatoes, peppers, berries and mushrooms down their brown-toothed maws, only for the grim parasite in their guts to hoover half the goodness out of their rich harvest, leaving these peons hungry to the point of collapse.īanished is a taxing game. Their prodigious appetites and the strange ease with which they would starve to death had more reason to it then. It made more sense once I decided that everyone in the town had tapeworm. It's out now, and I spent the weekend with it. You build and you harvest, and you keep your population healthy enough in order that they might breed and expand. Banished is an indie sandbox city building simulation, in which you have free reign to grow a nascent medieval town using only the resources gained from the land around it.

Buy banished pc game